ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto orçamentário do tratamento com iPARP como primeira linha de manutenção, comparado ao tratamento-padrão a partir de evidências de mundo real sob a perspectiva de um hospital público referência em oncologia no Rio de Janeiro. Métodos: Foi aplicada uma análise de impacto orçamentário para estimar a introdução das tecnologias iPARP, olaparibe e niraparibe, em comparação com o cenário referência, utilizando dados de eficácia e evidências de mundo real, e considerando os custos globais de tratamento da doença em cinco anos. Este estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa, CAAE: 95157018.9.0000.5274. Resultados: A análise demonstrou que o cenário referência apresentou um impacto orçamentário no valor de R$ 3.578.768,04 em cinco anos. No cenário alternativo, o custo incremental do olaparibe chegou a ser 23,8% maior, comparado ao niraparibe, atingindo um custo de R$ 23.736.459,20 versus R$ 18.076.951,81, respectivamente. Os parâmetros que apresentaram maior impacto nas análises para a tecnologia olaparibe foram a difusão da tecnologia e o preço do medicamento. Contudo, para o niraparibe, os parâmetros de maior impacto foram a duração do tratamento, a difusão da tecnologia e a dose utilizada, demonstrando maior suscetibilidade de variação. Conclusão: Os iPARP no tratamento de pacientes com carcinoma de ovário avançado, apesar de apresentarem custo incremental de aproximadamente R$ 23 milhões em cinco anos, apontam para uma potencial redução de custos associados à progressão da doença.
Objective: Assess the budgetary impact of treatment with iPARP as a first line of maintenance, compared to standard treatment based on real-world evidence from the perspective of a public hospital reference in oncology at Rio de Janeiro. Methods: A budget impact analysis was applied to estimate the introduction of iPARP, olaparib and niraparib technologies, compared to the reference scenario, using efficacy data and real-world evidence, and considering the global costs of treating the disease in five years. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, CAAE: 95157018.9.0000.5274. Results: The analysis showed that the reference scenario presented a budgetary impact of R$ 3,578,768.04 in five years. In the alternative scenario, the incremental cost of olaparib reached 23.8% higher compared to niraparib, reaching a cost of R$ 23,736,459.20 versus R$ 18,076,951.81, respectively. The parameters that had the greatest impact on the analyzes for the olaparib technology were technology diffusion and drug price. However, for niraparib, the parameters with the greatest impact were the duration of treatment, the diffusion of the technology and the dose used, demonstrating greater susceptibility to variation. Conclusion: iPARP in the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma, despite having an incremental cost of approximately R$ 23 million in five years, point to a potential reduction in costs associated with disease progression.
Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors , Analysis of the Budgetary Impact of Therapeutic AdvancesABSTRACT
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a rapidly developing malignant tumor, which is highly heterogeneous and prone to drug resistance, and the prognosis is usually poor. Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors target the DNA damage response pathway, preventing DNA repair, thereby exerting anti-tumor effects. Currently, PARP inhibitors are used as monotherapy or in combination with DNA-damaging agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of SCLC. Although the current research results are limited, it can be seen that PARP inhibitors may be a breakthrough in the targeted therapy of SCLC.
ABSTRACT
The common adverse reactions caused by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors include hematological toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue. The main prevention and treatment of hematological toxicity include: regular blood tests, referral to hematology department when routine treatment is ineffective, and being alert of myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia. The key points to deal with gastrointestinal toxicity include: taking medicine at the right time, light diet, appropriate amount of drinking water, timely symptomatic treatment, prevention of expected nausea and vomiting, and so on. For fatigue, full assessment should be completed before treatment because the causes of fatigue are various; the management includes massage therapy, psychosocial interventions and drugs such as methylphenidate and Panax quinquefolius according to the severity. In addition, niraparib and fluzoparib can cause hypertension, hypertensive crisis and palpitation. Blood pressure and heart rate monitoring, timely symptomatic treatment, and multidisciplinary consultation should be taken if necessary. When cough and dyspnea occur, high resolution CT and bronchoscopy should be performed to exclude pneumonia. If necessary, PARP inhibitors should be stopped, and glucocorticoid and antimicrobial therapy should be given. Finally, more attention should be paid to drug interaction management, patient self-management and regular monitoring to minimize the risk and harm of adverse reactions of PARP inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Humans , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Phthalazines/pharmacology , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases , Fatigue/drug therapyABSTRACT
Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), which approved in recent years, are recommended for ovarian cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer and other cancers by The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines. Because most of PARPi are metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzyme system, there are extensive interactions with other drugs commonly used in cancer patients. By setting up a consensus working group including pharmaceutical experts, clinical experts and methodology experts, this paper forms a consensus according to the following steps: determine clinical problems, data retrieval and evaluation, Delphi method to form recommendations, finally formation expert opinion on PARPi interaction management. This paper will provide practical reference for clinical medical staff.
Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Consensus , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Interactions , Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose/therapeutic useABSTRACT
At present, ovarian cancer is one of the main diseases threatening women's life and health. The mortality ranks first among female reproductive system malignant tumors. Due to the hidden onset, more than 75% of them are at advanced stage once diagnosed. Advanced ovarian cancer is characterized with the Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ, very poor prognosis and the 5-year survival rate less than 50%. In recent years, the exploration of maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer is in full swing. A large number of studies show that poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Therefore, PARP inhibitors have gradually become an important part for treatment of ovarian cancer, and the indications have also been concerned by clinicians. This paper reviews the application of PARP inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are novel agents for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in recent years, and a variety of PARP inhibitors have been reported with clinical evidence for the beneficial. Although these drugs are actually of attributes with pharmacological similarities, due to the discrepancies in the molecular structure and pharmacodynamics, the respective efficacy and safety from clinical circumstances are quite varied. While it comes to the best clinical determination, the optimization for regimen is important on the basis of clinical exhaustiveness for the reports, in addition the laboratory examination for mCRPC, and either the tumorous genetic benchmark are necessarily being calculated.
ABSTRACT
Objective:The real-world clinical data of patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer) who received first-line maintenance therapy with poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) were retrospectively analyzed, and the prognostic factors were preliminarily explored.Methods:(1) The clinicopathological data and follow-up data of ovarian cancer patients treated with PARPi first-line maintenance therapy from August 2018 (PARPi was launched in China) to December 31, 2021 in Sichuan Cancer Hospital were collected (real-world clinical data). (2) According to the different types of PARPi, real-world clinical data were divided into olaparib group and niraparib group, which were respectively compared with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of representative domestic and foreign phase Ⅲ randomized controlled trials (RCT), including olaparib as first-line maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1/2 gene mutation (SOLO-1 study), niraparib as first-line maintenance therapy (PRIMA study), and niraparib as first-line maintenance therapy for Chinese advanced ovarian cancer patients (PRIME study). (3) The prognosis of the two groups and the prognostic factors were analyzed.Results:(1) A total of 83 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 51 years (47-57 years), including 75 cases of ovarian cancer, 5 cases of fallopian tube cancer, and 3 cases of primary peritoneal cancer; 5 cases of stage Ⅰ, 9 cases of stage Ⅱ, 55 cases of stage Ⅲ, 12 cases of stage Ⅳ, and 2 cases of unknown stage; neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was performed in 40 cases and non-NACT in 43 cases; 62 cases had no visible residual lesion after surgery (R0), 9 cases had residual disease lesions <1 cm (R1), 8 cases had residual disease lesions ≥1 cm (R2), and 4 cases with unknown postoperative residual disease. Thirty-two cases had PARPi treatment interruption, 40 cases had PARPi reduction, and 1 case terminated treatment due to acute leukemia. Of the 83 patients, 35 were in the olaparib group and 48 were in the niraparib group. The proportion of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (100% and 75%, respectively) and the proportion of BRCA mutant patients (91% and 10%, respectively) in the olaparib group were higher than those in the niraparib group (all P<0.01). (2) Compared with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the SOLO-1 study, the olaparib group had only 60% (21/35) coincidence rate; compared with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of PRIMA and PRIME studies, the coincidence rates of niraparib group were only 31% (15/48) and 69% (33/48). The most common reasons for non-compliance were number of chemotherapy courses, histopathological type, and surgical pathological stage. (3) Of the 83 cases received first-line maintenance therapy with PARPi, the median follow-up was 15.9 months (11.3-22.9 months), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 29.7 months (95% CI: 25.9-33.6 months), and the median overall survival was 49.8 months (95% CI: 47.4-52.2 months). Univariate analysis showed that unilateral or bilateral ovarian cancer, efficacy after platinum-containing chemotherapy, presence or absence of measurable lesions at the end of chemotherapy, and total number of chemotherapy courses were significantly associated with PFS (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that unilateral or bilateral ovarian cancer, total number of chemotherapy courses, and efficacy after platinum-containing chemotherapy were independent factors affecting PFS in stage Ⅱ-Ⅳ patients with PARPi first-line maintenance therapy (all P<0.05). Conclusions:Unilateral ovarian cancer, the total number of chemotherapy courses no more than 9, and achieving complete response after platinum-containing chemotherapy before maintenance therapy are independent influencing factors of PFS benefit in patients with PARPi first-line maintenance therapy. Due to the large differences between the patients in real clinical practice and the research subjects of phase Ⅲ RCT, the results of representative retrospective studies still have important clinical reference significance.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the expression of DNA damage repair factor DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1) in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues, and the effect of DDB1 gene silencing on DNA repair and targeted killing in human hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC-7721 cells.Methods:The UALCAN platform was used to perform bioinformatics analysis on the expression of DDB1 in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues (371 cases) and paracancerous tissues (50 cases) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the correlation of DDB1 expression with the overall survival of liver cancer patients were analyzed by bioinformatics using the UALCAN platform. SMMC-7721 cells were transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting DDB1 and negative control siRNA, which were DDB1 silencing group and negative control group, respectively. X-ray irradiation induced exogenous DNA double strand break (DSB) damage in the two groups of cells. Immunofluorescence staining (γH2AX was used for assessing cellular DSB damage, RPA32s33 and Rad51 were used for assessing homologous recombination repair) and Western blotting (were used to detect the level of RPA32s33 protein) were used to analyze the effect of DDB1 gene silencing on DSB damage repair. Sister chromosome exchange (SCE) experiment was used to analyze the frequency of SCE of homologous recombination of cells in DDB1 silencing group and negative control group. Tetramethylazozolium salt (MTT) method was used to analyze the killing effect of PARP inhibitor olapani (10 μmol/L), cisplatin (1 μg/ml) and olapani combined with cisplatin on SMMC-7721 cells in DDB1 silencing group and negative control group.Results:Bioinformatics analysis showed that the level of DDB1 mRNA in liver cancer tissues was higher than that in paracancerous tissues ( P < 0.001), and the overall survival of patients with high expression of DDB1 was worse than that of patients with low expression of DDB1 ( P = 0.029). When cultured for 4 hours after X-ray irradiation, the number of γH2AX foci in cells of the negative control group had mostly disappeared, and there were still more cells in DDB1 silencing group [(5.1±2.0) per cell vs. (13.4±2.0) per cell, t = -5.08, P = 0.007]. When cultured for 4 hours after X-ray irradiation, the number of RPA32s33 foci in the negative control group [(30.8±5.0) per cell vs. (13.2±1.6) per cell] and the number of Rad51 foci [(19.5±1.8) per cell vs. (8.3±3.3) per cell] were higher than those in the DDB1 silencing group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (both P < 0.01). The frequency of SCE in the negative control group was higher than that in the DDB1 silencing group [(21.2±3.0)% vs. (11.2±1.6)%, t = 5.07, P = 0.007]. MTT assay showed that after olaparib treatment, the survival rate of cells in the DDB1 silencing group was lower than that in the negative control group [(40.3±3.6)% vs. (79.8±1.3)%, t = 17.94, P < 0.001]. When treated with olapani combined with cisplatin, the survival rate of cells in the two groups further decreased, and the survival rate of cells in the DDB1 silencing group was lower than that in the negative control group [(10.2±2.8)% vs. (29.6±3.4)%, t = 7.72, P = 0.002]. When treated with cisplatin alone, there was no significant difference in cell survival between DDB1 silencing group and negative control group [(41.9±5.1)% vs. (49.8±3.3)%, t = 2.71, P = 0.054]. Conclusions:The high expression of DDB1 in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues may be an important factor in the treatment resistance and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Knockdown of DDB1 gene expression can promote the sensitivity of SMMC-7721 cells to PARP inhibitors, and its mechanism may be related to the homologous recombination repair defect of SMMC-7721 cells caused by DDB1 silencing.
ABSTRACT
Poly（ADP-ribose）polymerase（PARP）is a kind of DNA damage repair enzyme. PARP inhibitors include Olaparib （AZD2281），Niraparib（MK-4827），Rucaparib，Veliparib（ABT-888），Fluzoparib and Talazoparib （BMN-673），etc. This article reviews the preclinical research on the combined application of PARP inhibitors against tumor by searching the relevant literatures. Through the synthetic lethal mode ，PARP inhibitors have a strong killing effect on tumor cells with homologous recombination repair defects. However ，for tumor cells with intact DNA damage repair function ，PARP inhibitors often need to be combined with radiotherapy or other drugs to play a role. Combined application drugs include antiangiogenic drugs ，heat shock protein 90 inhibitors，cyclin-dependent kinase 12 inhibitors，immune checkpoint inhibitors ，histone deacetylase inhibitors ，etc. The combined application of PARP inhibitors is expected to enhance the efficacy of anti-tumor drugs and achieve the goals of sensitization ， synergism and reversal of drug resistance ，which is worthy of further in-depth research and exploration of new combined treatment schemes.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the clinical features of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-related anemia in advanced and relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).Methods:Patients diagnosed with advanced or relapsed EOC and treated with PARP inhibitor at National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between January 2015 to October 2020 were accrued. The data included PARP inhibitors, treatment details, and lab tests before treatment and during treatment were collected and the clinical characteristics of PARP inhibitor-related anemia were analyzed.Results:(1) A total of 98 patients with a median age of 56.5 years old (30-82 years old) were enrolled in this study. All patients were treated with PARP inhibitor (65 cases of olaparib, 17 cases of niraparib, and 16 cases of fluzoparib). The median treatment duration was 37.5 weeks (4-119 weeks). (2) The anemia rate was 40% (39/98), including 5% (5/98) of grade Ⅰ, 14% (14/98) of grade Ⅱ, 11% (11/98) of grade Ⅲ, and 9% (9/98) of grade Ⅳ. Fourteen patients with pre-treatment grade Ⅰ anemia had a higher rate of anemia events than the 80 patients without pre-treatment anemia, 7/14 vs 35% (28/80; χ2=4.281, P=0.039). (3) The median anemia occurrence time was 7.0 weeks (1-52 weeks), including 41% (16/39) of anemia cases occurred in 1-4 weeks, 26% (10/39) occurred in 5-8 weeks, 13% (5/39) occurred in 9-12 weeks, 3% (1/39) occurred in 13-16 weeks, 10% (4/39) occurred in 17-20 weeks, 8% (3/39) occurred ≥21 weeks. At the time of the lowest hemoglobulin tested, the median value of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) was 106 fl,which was higher than the up limit of normal range (100 fl), 74% (29/39) of anemia patients had an elevated MCV level; the median value of mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) was 36 pg, 54% (21/39) of anemia patients had an elevated MCH level; the median value of mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was 320 g/L, 69% (27/39) of anemia patients had a higher MCHC level; 92% (36/39) of anemia patients had a normal level of serum iron; 79% (31/39) of anemia patients had a normal level of transferrin. 74% (29/39) of the anemia patients were macrocytic orthochromatic anemia. (4) Among the 39 patients with anemia, 20 patients (51%, 20/39) withhold the treatment of PARP inhibitor due to grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ anemia, including 10 patients (50%, 10/20) who resumed the PARP inhibitor treatment by suppling iron, folate, and vitamin B 12. The median stopping time of PARP inhibitor was 5.5 weeks (2-10 weeks), while the other 10 patients terminated the PARP inhibitor treatment for not recovering from severe anemia. Conclusions:One of the common adverse effects of PARP inhibitors is anemia, which mostly happened in the first 3 months of treatment. In the treatment of EOC, PARP inhibitor-related anemia mainly manifest as macrocytic orthochromatic anemia, and most patients with normal serum iron and transferrin.
ABSTRACT
Ovarian cancer is a common gynecological malignancy and the most common cause of cancer death. Ovarian cancer is usually treated with surgery combined with chemotherapy as the preferred treatment. In recent years, with the continuous development of medical technology and the in-depth research on ovarian cancer at home and abroad, the molecular targeted therapy of ovarian cancer has received extensive attention. Among them, the poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have made great breakthroughs and advances in the precise and standardized treatment of ovarian cancer. This paper discusses the study of PARP inhibitors in sensitivity biomarkers of ovarian cancer, and reviews the standardized treatment of PARP inhibitors in maintenance therapy of ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
Ovarian cancer is one of the three major gynecological tumors, and its incidence is increasing year by year. Although the current treatment of ovarian cancer has made great progress, the survival rate of patients with ovarian cancer is still low. It is a constant direction for clinicians and researchers to look for more effective treatment with fewer side effects. In recent years, the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are more widely used in the research of ovarian cancer. Niraparib, as a new PARP inhibitor, is the frst targeted drug for the treatment of recurrent ovarian epithelial cancer. Niraparib has a good therapeutic effect for breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) wild type and mutant type of patients with ovarian cancer, especially when it combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This article aims to summarize the application of niraparib in ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for treating recurrent ovarian cancer.Methods The databases of Medline,Embase,Central and SinoMed were retrieved with the retrieval time from their establishment to September 2017;in addition the related reference literatures were manually retrieved.The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PARP inhibitors for treating recurrent ovarian cancer were included.The meta analysis was performed by using the RevMan 5.3 software.Results A total of 5 RCTs were included,including 1 160 cases in the experimental group and 679 cases in the control group.When compared with placebo,PARP inhibitors significantly improved the progression-free survival [HR=0.34,95％CI(0.30,0.40),P＜0.01] and overall survival [HR=0.73,95％CI(0.55,0.96),P=0.025],and increased objective response rate [RR=2.56,95％CI(1.17,5.59),P=0.020].The addition of PARP inhibitors to chemotherapy reduced the risk of disease progression [HR =0.51,95 ％CI (0.34,0.77),P =0.001].However,there were no statistically significant differences in overall survival [HR=1.17,95％CI(0.79,1.73),P=0.440] and objective response rate [RR=1.11,95％CI(0.86,1.42),P =0.420] between the PARP inhibitors plus chemotherapy group and the chemotherapy alone group.The administration of PARP inhibitors was associated with a significantly increased risk of serious anemia,fatigue,nausea and vomiting.Conclusion PARP inhibitors could improve the progression-free survival outcome in recurrent ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
In 2017, 10 topics were selected as major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology. For cervical cancer, efficacy and safety analysis results of a 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and long-term impact of reduced dose of quadrivalent vaccine were updated. Brief introduction of KEYNOTE trials of pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between programmed death (PD)-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, followed. Tailored surveillance programs for gynecologic cancer related with Lynch syndrome and update on sentinel lymph node mapping were reviewed for uterine corpus cancer. For ovarian cancer, 5 topics were selected including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases inhibitors and immunotherapy. The other potential practice changers covered in this review were lymphadenectomy in advanced disease, secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent disease, weekly dose-dense regimen for first-line chemotherapy, incorporation of bevacizumab maintenance in platinum-sensitive recurrent disease, and effect of platinum-free interval prolongation. Conflicting opinions of academic societies on periodic pelvic examination were introduced in conjunction with relevant literature review. For the field of radiation oncology, results of 2 big trials, The Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma-3 and Gynecologic Oncology Group-258, for endometrial cancer and recent advance in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer were reported. Topics for breast cancer covered adjuvant capecitabine after preoperative chemotherapy, adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease, olaparib for metastatic cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation, 20-year risks of recurrence after stopping endocrine therapy at 5 years, and contemporary hormonal contraception and the risk of breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Bevacizumab , Brachytherapy , Breast Neoplasms , Capecitabine , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Contraception , Drug Therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms , Gynecological Examination , Immunotherapy , Ligands , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases , Radiation Oncology , ErbB Receptors , Recurrence , Trastuzumab , Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsABSTRACT
The annual review of 2011 comprised 11 themes of major research achievements in gynecologic oncology including breast cancer. A potential paradigm shift in the management of ovarian cancer was reviewed through comprehensive genomic analyses and a tumor-specific new intraoperative fluorescence imaging technique using folate receptor-alpha targeted agent, which is expected to improve intraoperative staging and more radical cytoreduction. In addition, updates of bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, and risk evaluation of pelvic mass were discussed. Regarding cervical cancer, this review covered new findings on human papillomavirus vaccines and human papillomavirus tests as well as the current status of clinical trials on locally advanced cervical cancer. The promising role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early stage endometrial cancer was followed by two notable clinical researches on: exemestane, an aromatase inhibitor, for the prevention of breast cancer and eribulin, a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Lastly, in premenopausal women with breast cancer, the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue on the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced early menopause was discussed.